Twenty years of creative innovation practice, encoded into AI agents that work together.
Method, techniques, tools, stances: our know-how is built into several agents, step by step.
Two stances that run through every phase
Dynamic stance
Sensitive stance
of the tasks entrusted to teams of AI agents fail, for lack of orchestration.
It is not a matter of raw power. The same failures occur with GPT-4o or Claude. But when the agents are reorganized without changing the model, results climb by 9 to 16 points. The lever is orchestration.
In AI Innovation Box, each agent has a precise instruction at a precise step. All of them share the context built with you. And you arbitrate at every step: that is the verification the others lack.
Cemri et al., “Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?”, NeurIPS 2025, arXiv:2503.13657. Failure rates from 41% to 86.7% depending on the system, over 1,642 runs of 7 multi-agent systems.
The iasagora foundation
CPS (Creative Problem Solving), Design Thinking, C-K theory (Concept-Knowledge) and our two stances: a framework drawn from published research on creativity.
An active academic partnership
The IA . Innovation Club and the LaPEA (Université Paris Cité) put the tool to the test over time.
ia-innovation.clubLa posture sensible, a book
The three movements of the sensitive techniques come from the LDS model (logical, dynamic, sensitive), described in La posture sensible (“The Sensitive Stance”), co-written by Guy Aznar and Stéphane Ely (Créa Université, 2010).
See the book